STC's 48th Conference, Chicago, May 13-16, 2001
For the first time at the 2001 conference, a "stream" of presentations focused on safety, regulatory and environmental communcations. Here are summaries. Download Conference materials from the STC website.
Strategies for Communicating Risk Hillary Hart, University of Texas; Donald E. Zimmerman, Colorado State University; Frederick M. O'Hara Jr.
This trio explored the history of risk-communication strategies as they have changed over the past two decades. They described a current research project, a review of best practices from the fields of communication science and social science, and an example of the role of the Web in communicating risks to the public.
Participatory Decision-Making, Technology, and the Environment
Carolyn D. Rude, Texas Tech University;
John C. Gooch, The Institute of Environmental and Human
Health; Heather Sehmel, Texas Tech University; Charlotte
Kaempf, IWK Universitaet Karlsruhe
This session explored ways in which knowledge in technical communication applies to settings beyond high tech, particularly to participatory decision-making on environmental issues.
An
Overview of Science and Medical Writing
Hillary Hart, University
of Texas; Frederick M. O'Hara Jr.; Amy L. Burdan, Eli
Lilly and Company
This panel reviewed the history and development of science and medical writing, including communication products, social roles, and employment opportunities.
Designing
Safety Information: Balancing Hazards and Solutions
Carol
S. Hoeniges, Hile Group; Jean A. Schiller, Applied Safety
& Ergonomics, Inc.; Lisa A. Tallman, ArborComm, Inc.
This panel discussion addressed the design of safety information including warnings for consumer products and safety rule books. Presenters explored methods of identifying hazards, writing by team-based process, and addressing liability concerns.
[ back to top ]
Communicating
with Nontraditional Audiences
Kathy Hall, University of Washington; Kris S. Freeman,
University of Washington; Adrienne Hidy, University
of Washington
This panel discussion focused on translating technical messages to nontraditional audiences (youth, non-English-speaking, labor) without losing accuracy.
Nontraditional
Communication about Health Risks: Migrant Farm Worker
Audience
Donald
E. Zimmerman, Colorado State University; Kathy Hall,
University of Washington; Adrienne Hidy, University
of Washington
This session presented nontraditional techniques (such as theatre, calendars, and pictographs) that University of Washington researchers use to communicate with migrant farm workers about pesticide hazards.
Editing Progression
Elaine
C. David, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory;
Anne L. Block; Deirdre A. Murr, Walt Disney Imagineering;
Patti L. Raley, Eli Lilly and Company; David D. Dayton,
University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez; Donald A. Huntington
In this progression, session leaders discuss editing issues such as electronic editing, self-editing, quality control, and editorial wisdom.
Designing
for the Web: Special Considerations for Safety Information
Lisa
A. Tallman, ArborComm, Inc.; Jean A. Schiller, Applied
Safety and Ergonomics, Inc.
When designing online documents such as owners' manuals, safety information that meets users' needs and legal considerations should be a focus. This session discussed designing safety information on the Web.
Progression
Session Sponsored by the Scientific Communication SIG
Amy
L. Burdan, Eli Lilly and Company; Elaine R. Firestone,
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/SAIC GSC; Donald C.
Samson, Jr., Radford University; Terry H. Gregory, Space
Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison
This progression provided a venue for Scientific Communication SIG members to present their research, case studies, and practical applications related to science writing and editing in the 21st century.
[ back to top ]
The ABCs of Medical Communication
Karen
Boleyn, Eli Lilly and Company; Patti Raley, Eli Lilly
and Company' Erin Walls, Eli Lilly and Company; Barbara
Campaigne, Eli Lilly and Company
In an overview of the medical communication profession in the pharmaceutical industry, this panel discussion examined regulatory and commercialization writing opportunities during each phase of the drug development process.
Training Scientific Communicators for the Global
Workplace Environment
Sheila Bennett, Bowling Green State University; Amy
L. Burdan, Eli Lilly and Company; Stephanie Brown, Eli
Lilly and Company; Karen Boleyn, Eli Lilly and Company;
Ronald J. Tulley, Bowling Green State University
This panel discussion addressed the challenges industry takes in training scientific communicators to be successful information architects in a global environment.
Issues in Scientific Communication
David L. Armbruster, University of Tennessee Health
Science Center; Jeffrey L. Hibbard, IBM Thomas J. Watson
Research Center; Murrie W. Burgan, Johns Hopkins University
Applied Physics Laboratory; David E. Nadziejka, Upjohn
Institute; Christine M. Farmery, Algorithmics, Inc.
Members of this panel discussion presented important issues of scientific communication: e-prints, authorship, editing, legislators, and the public.
Careful
Scientific Writing
Donald C. Samson Jr., Radford University; Elaine R.
Firestone, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/SAIC GSC
This session identified techniques for writing about science and technology for newspaper and magazine articles, and for scientific publications. Participants learned about the pitfalls that can be fixed in scientific documents.
Rulemaking, Public Policy, and Regulatory Writing
Kathy
Hall, University of Washington; Karen S. Griggs, Kettering
University; Hillary Hart, University of Texas; Gail
Hughes, State of Washington, Department of Labor and
Industries
Agencies are rewriting regulations for clarity and better understanding. This panel discussion examined these changes and how they affect communicators.




Resources (WIKI)