THOUGHT-LEADER INTERVIEWS
by Dr. Jackie Damrau
Do you know of an instructional design Thought Leader
whom we can interview? We are looking for a volunteer to help the Newsletter
Staff by emailing our Thought-Leader Questionnaire to at least two Thought
Leaders per quarter. The Thought Leaders’ responses will be published
in IDeaLs. Are you interested? Contact jdamrau3@airmail.net.
This new column will offer you insights into how instructional
design Thought Leaders, like Ruth Clark or Jack Phillips, got started
in the profession as well as their thoughts on where the profession
is headed.
Two of our own IDL members—Elizabeth Bailey
and Karen Baranich—took the opportunity to answer the Thought-Leader
Questionnaire.
ELIZABETH BAILEY
1. Tell us briefly about your professional background?
How did you get started in the instructional design profession?
I started working at a job where I was required
to communicate with politicians and their staff members, where I discovered
that communication was not all about speaking, listening, and worrying
about filters. It was more about preparing what you had to say for the
intended audience. As I progressed through my jobs and my education,
I discovered more and more about the communication needed to prepare
verbal and written documentation. Through these jobs, I was asked to
prepare short training sessions for people regarding job processes and
learned more about analysis.
2. What keeps you excited today about continuing to work in this profession?
After a few times in front of people, I discovered
that there was more than just the audience consideration, there was
the need to understand what they already knew and how they were going
to accept my information (or not). This, of course, led to my learning
more about task analysis, needs analysis, and adult learning styles
and methodologies. Hence, I have a desire to learn more and more in
the realm of communicating within our communities of practice and outside
of those, seeking best practices to share with others. I like sharing
information.
3. Did you ever think you would become an expert in
this professional field?
Not really. I failed to understand that people,
everyday laymen in my field, sometimes didn't grasp the same things
I have learned over the years. What may have taken me a few minutes
to understand and translate into practical use in my everyday job, these
people don't always get the first time. So, I have learned to find ways
to share this knowledge with others who are interested. (This is the
hard part – shutting up when they aren't interested and figuring
out they are not interested without the need of a frying pan upside
my head! ?)
4. What are the core principles of instructional design
that are as important today as they were when you started? What core
skills do you feel instructional designers should focus on today?
I see more and more integration of business units
within organizations and training departments. People need more understanding
of how to do their jobs and what is expected. So, I see the business
trying to communicate objectives and strategies to their employees and
needing the assistance of communication and training departments to
get this information across, since not every business unit has people
who excel in understanding how to communicate with others.
5. What aspects of online learning will be most useful
in the future? Why?
a. online modules (asynchronous, self-paced, on-demand)
b. online conferencing
c. blended learning (some combination of live instructor, online conference,
and/or online modules)
I believe the Internet is becoming an increasing
powerhouse AND blended learning is still an option. Not all learners
learn the same way. Many authors have researched and written on this
topic by comparing the Internet as a resource for information AND as
a learning media. Our task is to ensure that managers and decision makers
understand that an audience, organization, and environment analysis
is required to determine which media and methods are better for the
specified environment.
We need to learn how to relate this to things
executive management and upper management understand. For example, many
managers have already been sold on the concept that there are different
leadership styles. So, let's educate them on learning styles as well.
6. What one nugget of advice would you offer today
to someone who is thinking about entering the instructional design field?
Be prepared to understand that you may never learn everything. This
is such a large field; you may want to consider reducing your scope
of absorption to some sub-set of the profession: learning methodologies,
analysis methods, evaluation methods, design methods, etc. Or, you may
find that your interests slide into a specific area in which you feel
comfortable. Be okay with this.
7. Are degree or commercial certificate programs
preferred? Do you have any recommendations for online programs versus
traditional college programs? Do you view a certificate as being better
than a degree?
My opinion on this is based on my audience.
When I seek new employment, for example, I see what positions are available.
Then, I research the company and see what they tout among their current
employees. If they are proud of their degreed employees and list this
information in their corporate web site and annual reports, then that
tells me they want to know about my education. If they are proud of
the number of employees with certifications, then I know that I need
to slant my formal education around comparisons to certifications and
emphasize that I maintain my knowledge base and keep my understanding
of the industry current. I personally prefer some sort of accredited
method of learning. However, everyone needs to understand that once
you get your preferred degree, your education is not over. This field
is growing so much, as people are researching and discovering new methods
of doing things and sharing that information with others. You must be
willing to keep up with the field and learn as much as you can to enhance
your successes over time.
8. What reference materials or books would you
recommend are important for instructional designers to have in their
personal libraries?
Handbook of Human Performance Technology
: Improving Individual and Organizational Performance Worldwide
by Harold D. Stolovitch (Editor), Erica J. Keeps
Publisher: Pfeiffer; 2nd edition (March 26, 1999)
ISBN: 0787911089.
Fundamentals of Performance Technology, Second
Edition
by Darlene M. Van Tiem, James L. Moseley, Joan Conway Dessinger
Publisher: Intl Society for Performance;
2nd edition (April, 2004)
ISBN: 1890289175 .
Human Performance Technology Revisited
by Roger Chevalier
Publisher: Intl Society for Performance
(April, 2004)
ISBN: 1890289183 .
The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic
in Adult Education and Human Resource Development
by Ph.D., Malcolm S. Knowles, III, Ed.D., Elwood F. Holton, Ph.D., Richard
A. Swanson
Publisher: Gulf Professional Publishing;
5th edition (1998)
ISBN: 0884151158 .
9. Share with us your views on the future of
instructional design?
Unfortunately, I still see a need in proving ourselves. To do that,
we need to network with upper and executive management within our organizations
and other organizations. We need to clearly document (yes, write white
papers and presentations) on our success stories. We need to share our
challenges, our constraints, our assumptions, our actions, our results,
our post-evaluation, our recommendation for going forward in similar
circumstances, and then figure out a way to present this information
so that the "concepts" can be applied to other, similar instances.
So, we need to find a way to determine how to word the initial issue
we faced in such a way that others can recognize similar issues in their
own environments and recognize "Oh, yeah, I heard about someone
who faced something like this and results of that performance is documented
...."
KAREN BARANICH
1. Tell us briefly about your professional background?
How did you get started in the instructional design profession?
I became interested in scripting for interactive
multimedia back in the 1980s in an undergraduate class in Media Arts.
I knew a lot about media, but decided I didn't know much about education,
so I went back to school for a Masters and eventually a Doctorate in
Educational Psychology. Now I figured I knew enough, but didn’t
have a job that let me use what I learned.
I was with a company working on a government grant
as an education coordinator and my position was deleted. Out looking
for a job, a friend sent me to a computer-oriented job fair. The guy
asked me what I did and I said, "I write scripts for computer-based
training." The only word he heard was "write." I was
sent for a job as a technical writer, and was hired. Since writing and
training are combined at my company, I get to do everything.
2. What keeps you excited today about continuing to
work in this profession?
It's always changing. There is a continuing challenge
to become better and more creative—delivering ever better designed
instruction.
3. Did you ever think you would become an expert
in this professional field?
I’m not an industry expert, yet I have
a desire to learn all that I can about the instructional design profession.
4. What are the core principles of instructional design
that are as important today as they were when you started? What core
skills do you feel instructional designers should focus on today?
I think it will become increasingly important to companies.
Really, I use instructional design principles in writing and public
speaking as well as training—both classroom and CBT.
5. What aspects of online learning will be most useful
in the future? Why?
a. online modules (asynchronous, self-paced, on-demand)
b. online conferencing
c. blended learning (some combination of live instructor, online conference,
and/or online modules)
Blended learning will always be an option. Some
people just do not learn well by themselves. The human interaction will
always be an important part of the learning process. If you think about
how kids learn, some of it is from watching TV, reading books, playing
video, and other non-human tutors, but these things are never going
to replace or do better than the attention they receive from mom, dad,
siblings, or teachers. That being said, I think that most instructors
in the classroom fail to use the technology to its fullest extent. The
“blend” part is missing, or poorly done so that what you
end up with is two sides with a really weak link between them.
6. What one nugget of advice would you offer today
to someone who is thinking about entering the instructional design field?
Don’t limit your vision. Allow yourself
to be open to new technologies and innovative solutions to the training
opportunity. My second nugget, which you didn’t ask for, is to
get a really good understanding of how people learn—the theory
upon which instructional design is based.
7. Are degree or commercial certificate programs preferred? Do you have
any recommendations for online programs versus traditional college programs?
Do you view a certificate as being better than a degree?
I think it depends on your learning style and
life circumstances. If you live somewhere that a degree program is an
option, I would say go for it. There is no substitute for the mentoring
and experience provided by a good instructor who is interested in your
development. Some of the most valuable things I learned were not even
in the classroom, but were nevertheless taught by my instructors—how
to operate effectively, how to write for publication, how to feel good
about what I was doing. For some, however, classroom training is not
an option. Time constraints, distance, availability of programs, etc.,
may all contribute to a person’s decision to take one type of
instruction over another.
8. What reference materials or books would you recommend
are important for instructional designers to have in their personal
libraries?
Learning and Instruction: Theory into Practice
by Margaret E. Gredler
Publisher: Prentice Hall; 5th edition (2004)
ISBN: 013111980X.
9. Share with us your views on the future of instructional
design?
It’s not new, but I think understanding
how people learn and what motivates them is the most important element.
You can add a bunch of bells and whistles and use the latest technologies,
but if the underlying instruction is poorly designed, the instruction
is worthless.