| CASE STUDY 2
B Y N A N C Y
H I L D E B R A N D T |
|||||
|
The second case comes from Michael Levick, currently of Mentorware (http://www.mentorware.com).
|
|||||
| My reaction |
This course used more technology to add more interactivity. However, a variant of this course design could be built into the PowerPoint format and converted more simply. Notice that the real power of the course is coming from the participants' own efforts to answer the questions. While it is nice to have tailored feedback based on the responses participants provide, they probably would have been equally eager to answer a question and then flip to a next slide that provided a rather complete answer, or perhaps several answers, based on answers anticipated from the students. An e-mail link provided at the end of the answer page would allow students to ask questions if there was part of the answer they didn't understand, or if they wanted to extend their thinking. If you have already built interactivity into your instructor-led PowerPoint course, it will take even less effort to create an effective online course. Your slides will already contain many thought-inducing questions and exercises. |
||||
| What do you think? Please e-mail me at nhild@attglobal.net. | |||||
|
Winter 2000 |
|||||