 |
THE RELUCTANT TRAINER
B Y N A N C Y
H I L D E B R A N D T
Silicon Valley Chapter
|
 |
| |
This column
is dedicated to members who count technical training as part or all of their
job responsibilities. The reluctant trainer focuses on the best way to improve performance
and considers instructor-led training only one of a number of alternatives.
|
| |
Alternatives
to "Death by PowerPoint" |
| The classic scenario |
I
walked into the training room at 3:00 to deliver my 15-minute segment
on Internet security and found these conditions:
- The day
of training was purely PowerPoint slides, with the occasional switch
to a computer display.
- The handout
was a copy of the PowerPoint slides.
- The room
was dark and 80 degrees with no air circulating. Opening the doors led
to noise from outside.
- Some participants
had just come from overseas.
In short,
this training situation had all the warning signs of imminent Death by
PowerPoint. I'd observed a full day of the same workshop with air conditioning,
but I'd still lost my concentration by 2:00 in the afternoon. How much
presentation in a dark room can a body tolerate?
Quite a bit,
apparently. One famous high-tech company here in Silicon Valley holds
a boot camp in Texas that consists of eight solid weeks of PowerPoint
training for its technical people. Immediately after training each day,
the participants head straight for the bar, then go back to the hotel
room to knock off some homework. So far no deaths have been reported.
In the belief
that training should not be fatal, I convened with a couple of colleagues
from other companies to brainstorm alternatives to Death by PowerPoint.
|
| More
interactive means more preparation? |
Don't buy
into the argument that PowerPoint training is done because PowerPoint
slides are the easiest and fastest to prepare. One colleague, who worked
at one of the leading database companies, redesigned a consulting skills
course to include many role-playing exercises and case studies. PowerPoint
slides were used only to present objectives, and posters around the room
were used as "anchors," so the course principles would be visible at all
times. The Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and trainers were delighted to
find that it took much less time to prepare these course materials than
a day of PowerPoint slides. Because the participants had more fun, those
doing the training had more fun also.
Even if role-playing
activities aren't appropriate for the particular type of technical training
you do, there are many other activities that still take less time to prepare
than PowerPoint slides. What
types of activities can be done in technical training? Here are some ideas.
| Think
workshop |
Get away
from presentations and focus on learning experiences. Analyze a case
study, troubleshoot a problem, make the steps for a procedure a discovery
process. Even new hires bring many skills into the room. |
| Interact
with or without computers |
Perhaps
for your type of training, the best workshop would call for a computer
for every participant, but suppose you don't have that luxury. There
are still many interactive ways that you can run the session. |
| Student
driver |
If you
have one computer set up with a projector, then instead of the trainer
demonstrating a procedure, get a participant to volunteer to be the
"driver." When he or she needs help, ask the group what they might
do at that point. When the group is participating in the demonstration,
it will be paced more at the group's learning speed, not at the speed
that the trainer can type and talk. |
| Group troubleshooting |
Have groups
troubleshoot a problem and come up with hypotheses, then get the student
driver to try out the solutions on the computer. Throw participant
questions back to the group. Consider yourself a trainer of last resort.
|
| Group
projects |
If you
can have a room with a few computers that small groups can share,
you can have them accomplish a procedure or solve a problem, with
the trainer floating as a resource person. If one group finishes early,
they can start floating also -- they will learn from the questions
they can't answer. |
| Offer variety |
If the
problem is complex, have small groups attack it first. Then have each
group write each possible solution on a Post-it note or piece of paper
and post them on a wall. The entire group can discuss how to organize
and rank them. (I've heard this referred to as the "dump and clump"
method.) If it is feasible to come up with multiple problems or case
studies to illustrate a single point, have each separate group present
both the problem and the solution to the entire group. |
| Self-reliance through documentation |
Shift
the focus from presenting information to making participants rely
on existing documentation. Hand out manuals, or pages printed from
online help if they cannot access a computer. (Participants tend to
want printouts of the documentation even when it is online.) Then
give individuals or small groups exercises that require them to look
up information. When answers to questions are in the documentation,
make the group find the answer there. This ensures that participants
will know how to use the existing documentation on the job. SMEs are
happy because they can put their efforts into the documentation, not
both documentation and training materials. |
| Small-group power |
Consider
the benefits of assigning tasks to small groups. In a large group,
most individuals are afraid of giving a wrong answer, asking a stupid
question, taking up the group's time. Small groups will help each
other reason through ideas, make guesses, be emboldened to ask questions.
Shy persons feel involved rather than alienated. In a training class
whose participants will continue to interact in the course of their
work, learning what others' specialties are during the course of group
activities, and learning which people they can rely on for information,
can prove to be a powerful benefit. |
| Keep
them dancing |
Look for
ways to change the groups throughout the day. Pass out numbers, then
reform groups by sequential number block, then by even/odd numbers,
and so on. (Ask the group to help you figure out the next clever number
grouping.) Or reorganize groups related to departments within the
company (same department, different department). A side benefit is
that it forces people to stand up and move around as they form new
groups; don't underestimate the power of keeping people awake.
|
| PowerPoint's strengths |
You must
present some information in your training, and even while an activity
is in progress it is helpful to have the instructions displayed on
a screen. In this case, the PowerPoint slide is used as a tool, not
a crutch, and the room is not kept dark during the entire day. |
|
| A
compromise: Purely PowerPoint to Interactive PowerPoint |
Even if you
cannot convince trainers to break away from a mostly PowerPoint presentation,
there are still ways to build in more trainer-participant interaction.
| Resist
the lure of technology |
Don't
build in technological diversions, such as PowerPoint transitions,
to entertain the audience. Instead, after each slide, ask yourself,
"Is there a question I could ask, a problem or activity I could present
that would make the group think more about this information?" Audiences,
particularly technical ones, are entertained when they have to think.
|
| Ask
frequent review questions |
Ask implication
questions. Build in frequent short quizzes. Present case studies based
on the material you've just presented and have small groups discuss
them, then compare notes with the other groups. |
| Guessing,
a powerful tool |
Jumble
the order of steps to a procedure and have small groups guess the
proper order before it is presented. This works best when the
there are seven or fewer steps. If you have time to print out the
steps on a piece of paper and cut them into strips, you can pass them
out to individuals and then have them line up to show the order of
the steps. |
| Movement enhances learning and memory |
For a
lesson on encryption and digital signatures, I made pairs of color-matched
keys to pass out to participants to demonstrate whose public and whose
private keys were used to scramble and unscramble the information.
By practicing with their own key pairs, participants can conceptualize
and remember this complex topic much more easily. It was as easy to
cut out keys from paper as it was to design a graphic on a PowerPoint
slide. |
The compromise
for group involvement is that you have less time to cover new material.
This is usually a good thing, as it forces you to prioritize information;
your groups probably weren't retaining the information in all those slides
anyway. The side benefit is that you will have fewer slides to prepare.
|
| The
final frontier |
Once you
convince trainers and Subject Matter Experts that preparation time for
an interactive presentation is usually less, there is still one large
hurdle to negotiate. In a purely PowerPoint presentation, the audience
may be dead, but the speaker has retained total control.
An interactive
presentation may lead to questions that cannot be answered. It may require
more group control and time management skills. The discussion may spin
off in unexpected directions. This may disconcert the trainer. This may,
in fact, terrify the trainer. It may require some train-the-trainer efforts
to accomplish the transition. But the results will be well worth the expedition
into new territory. Your trainers will start to observe the benefits of
allowing the participants to, well, participate, both in terms of enjoyment
during the class and mastery of material when the class is over.
There is
one more side benefit to charting out more interactivity in the classroom:
the leap to online training becomes much shorter. This is the subject
of future columns. For an overview of the direction in which we're heading,
see my
first column.
|
 |
Nancy Hildebrandt,
Ph.D., is a technical writer and trainer in San Jose, California. She has
done research at Harvard Medical School on how people process written information,
co-founded an e-commerce Web site, and taught at colleges in Japan. You
can reach her at nhild@pacbell.net. |
|
Fall 1999
Volume 2, # 4
|
|