

This article was originally printed in the January
2001 issue (Vol 7, No. 3)
About the Authors
If you want to ask Caroline a question about forms, visit www.formsthatwork.com.
|
|
STC Usability SIG Newsletter |
 |
| Why Users Don't Complain About Unusable Forms |
by Caroline Jarrett
The email lists have been abuzz with discussions of the usability issues in the Florida
ballot. A common question asked was why a ballot design with so many obvious ways of
failing its users attracted no attention before the recent U.S. Presidential election.
Caroline Jarrett, an expert in forms, is best known for her work with the UK Inland
Revenue. Caroline provided some insight into the special problems she faces, collecting
user feedback for public forms.
- Users don't realize that they have a right to complain if they can't understand official
forms.
- Users think that official forms are difficult, and that they must be that way.
- In general, people don't understand that it is possible to improve forms. Bad forms are
regarded as a fact of life, like bad weather.
- Most people, faced with an official form, simply don't make a mental note of what
happened. They just think, "How can I get this thing done and out of my life as
quickly as possible?" Users don't have a reason to remember, nor are they required to
remember their interaction with official forms. This makes it hard to find out what really
happened if you ask them later.
- People complain when the effort of making a complaint has some sensible relationship to
the chance of the complaint making a difference. And even then, they frequently complain
to the wrong person. For example, a voter who found the form a bit difficult might
complain to the people right there in the voting areapeople who probably have no way
of dealing with that complaint.
- It isn't remarkable that the Florida ballot is a bad form causing user errors. There are
probably millions of incorrect ballot papers all over the USA. The vote is counted by an
inexpensive or volunteer staff, brought in at rare intervals and asked to process the
ballot as quickly as they can. They're not paid to ask questions about why there are so
many bad ballots. So they don't. And even when you know the error rates, there usually
isn't much reason to investigate why the errors are happening. Palm Beach County had the
highest error rate of any county in the USA in the 1996 election, but it didn't make a
difference to the result in that election, so no one had any reason to find out what the
problems were. Unless there is a reason to check for errors and think about why they
happened, the cause of errors will never be found.
The message for usability peopleif you are changing an existing process, it's
easy to make the mistake of thinking that because it is working now, that it is working
well. Take time to find out all the details of what is really happening. Think about
whether the intended change will make a minor problem in the current system into a major
issue in the new system.
|