|
|
|
Usability and User Experience Resources |
 |
| Idea Market Afterthoughts 2004 |
How many users does it take for a (web) usability test?
Activator: Carol Barnum
5 starter questions:
- What is your testing goal? (You need to know this first to answer the other questions)
- How many users do you need to reach your goal?
- How do you define your users?
- What’s the basis for small numbers? How small is OK?
- The numbers controversy: Do small numbers work for web usability testing?
Testing goals:
- To find problems with the product
- To eliminate problems with the product
- To improve user satisfaction
- To determine if you made the right assumption about user tasks
- To help developers understand the user experience
- To learn from prototypes
- To determine the level of proficiency (e.g. time on task)
- To understand the Learnability of the product
- To determine quantitative issues
Numbers needed to reach goals:
- For summative (product completion testing, where statistical validity is needed) Need 25 to 30 or more users
- For exploratory testing, can use Nielsen model of 4 to 5 users (even as small as 3 users)
- Numbers depend on the kinds of users (users must match in experience, knowledge)
- Must select specific subset of user population; must use scenario-based tasks; for diagnostic purposes; part of iterative process
Controversy--Why web testing may be different:
- Jared Spool tested ecommerce sites
- Users given money with goal to find something to buy (open ended task)
- Rolf Molich directed comparative usability evaluation of Hotmail
- 9 different labs set up different goals and users
- Both studies showed that it takes many more users than 5
Question: can you test websites with small number of users?
Answer: Yes, when you
- Use scenarios
- Screen users to match specific subset of user population
Question: how do you know what’s generalizable?
Answer: When the following conditions are in place:
- Random sample with small numbers
- Common skill sets of users (e.g. level of domain knowledge)
- Same motivation from users (desire to reach task goals)
- Data may not be generalizable—not applicable to any user
- However, findings for different tasks can point up the same problem
- Issue may be information architecture
What types of users to recruit?
- It depends on business goals.
- If numbers are very small, try not to mix the users.
- Better to go for one end or the other on the continuum; avoid the middle.
- "Most people" is not a good description of the user.
- Should you separate the documentation from the product?
- Test documentation by itself
- Test product without document to see where users need it
- What to do with one user’s findings (outlier data)
- Examine the issue for severity
- Study the screener for particulars about this user
- Ask yourself: can you envision other users having this problem?
- Have you seen this in other studies?
- What is the importance of this user (validity—a big customer)?
How to validate the findings with small numbers
- Talk to tech support
- Talk to training
- Talk to sales/marketing support (but be cautious, because they may not be talking to users)
- Know what the product is supposed to do
- Know what the product can deliver
Reporting results
- Capture the "eureka" moment
- Shun percentages when sample size is small (say, instead, "several" users or "three out of five" users)
- Create a matrix of tasks
- Indicate success/failure
- Time
- Questions asked
- Sample comments
- Errors and severity (recovery from errors should also be noted)
- Distinguish confidence levels in findings
- Descriptive information is also useful (e.g. user confusion)
|